It might just be that the algorithm is trolling me, but The Hill article you link to is riddled with ads for Myers-Briggs personality assessments, which is yet another complex phenomena that people insist can be reduced to simple and broad categorization. Strong, the pseudoscience is.
"This fact is fortunate for math teachers because kids have a lot of math ideas, even kids who don’t think they do, so the more we can make math about the ideas kids have, the more kids will like math". TRUTH. Thank you Dan.
It might just be that the algorithm is trolling me, but The Hill article you link to is riddled with ads for Myers-Briggs personality assessments, which is yet another complex phenomena that people insist can be reduced to simple and broad categorization. Strong, the pseudoscience is.
Ummm just saying: "real" journalists thoughtfully ask questions. No credential required. I'd count you in the ranks of thoughtful questioners,, Dan.
🫡 Thank you!
"This fact is fortunate for math teachers because kids have a lot of math ideas, even kids who don’t think they do, so the more we can make math about the ideas kids have, the more kids will like math". TRUTH. Thank you Dan.